In a conference where one or more people address a large audience, it is common, after the presentation, to have a moment of discussion or Q&A between the audience and the speakers on stage. This is a very useful practice, but in my opinion, it has certain limitations that I propose to overcome through an alternative method.
These limitations exist for several reasons. On the one hand, the time allocated for this exchange is often too short. Late starts, prolonged interventions by the speakers, or other factors often reduce this time, which can be frustrating. The exchange then becomes limited, sometimes even too brief, and in terms of energy, it is not always easy. The audience is in a listening position, facing speakers who are legitimized by the role they have been given. Daring to speak up in this context is not easy, especially since ideas need time to mature after being heard.
On the other hand, some people are comfortable speaking in public, while others, even if they have valuable contributions to make, do not dare to express themselves orally. I am not saying that oral exchange after a presentation is a bad thing: on the contrary, it is very good and often brings a lot. We should nurture this moment, give it sufficient time, and facilitate it in a way that invites people to contribute. For example, by encouraging them from the start to prepare questions or interventions. But it needs to be complemented, so that the mutual contributions to collective intelligence are deeper.
To complement this interaction mechanism, I propose an alternative method. I distribute to each person in the room several sheets of blank paper, markers, pencils, pens, and a QR code. During a 5-minute sequence, I suggest they write on these sheets following three axes (they are free to choose one, several, or none):
This device deconstructs the traditional academic representation of the speaker or professor as the sole holder of knowledge. Every person in the room has knowledge to share, and it is by exchanging these knowledges that we move forward collectively.
Of course, not everyone is comfortable with writing, just as not everyone is comfortable speaking orally. That is why I propose, in a public setting, to alternate 5-minute sessions for written contributions with moments of oral discussion. The two approaches are complementary.
Each participant receives a QR code allowing them to access, via their phone, a digital sharing space. A specific folder is created for each exchange moment. Participants take photos of their contributions and share them in this space. The contributions then appear on the screen in real time, allowing the speakers on stage to take them into account and respond to them. People in the room can also access each contribution in detail via their phone, fostering both a collective dynamic and individual autonomy in accessing the knowledge produced.
Finally, it is essential that these written traces remain accessible and enduring, to create a lasting resource for everyone.
To implement this method very simply for the participants, I use the script: Single-file PHP file manager, file sharing, file browser and photo gallery.
In the context of businesses, as well as in associative, social, artistic, cultural mediation, cultural action, initial or professional training, and social action settings, mobilizing the collective intelligence of participants is a very powerful lever. It enables mutual enrichment, improved relationships, stronger cohesion, the emergence of ideas, the invention of projects, greater engagement, and more.
Collective intelligence tools are also powerful democratic tools. They have been largely developed within the field of popular education, where the contribution of each individual is valued far more than in the national education system, which, in France, unfortunately often remains too traditional in its approaches.
I have frequently participated in collective intelligence workshops, and I have facilitated, applied, refined, adapted, and even invented a number of them. Here, you will find a collection of tools that I have personally used, which are integrated into the methods I propose, supported by real-life use cases. I believe these tools are highly worth sharing, as I have seen so many beneficial effects from them! I often find myself thinking, during collective moments such as conferences, for example: it’s a shame to limit ourselves to passive listening—all these minds gathered together could, if mobilized more effectively, produce something greater collectively.